Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 16:12:22 +0100 From: Frank Staals <frank@fstaals.net> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn - but smaller? Message-ID: <87mww00w89.fsf@Shanna.FStaals.net> In-Reply-To: <20130123144050.GG51786@e-Gitt.NET> (Oliver Brandmueller's message of "Wed, 23 Jan 2013 15:40:50 %2B0100") References: <20130123144050.GG51786@e-Gitt.NET>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Oliver Brandmueller <ob@e-Gitt.NET> writes: > <snip> > > So, is there some alternative small svn client, that leaves a > drastically smaller footprint probably somewhere around, probably even > in the ports or is there anything I'm missing? > <snip> This type of question has been asked quite a few times recently. At this point there is no svn version of csup, however there were people working on it (or at least: there is a svnsup project). For details please search recent ports or questions mailing list archives. As far as I know there is also no alternative svn-client. I'm kind of surprised for the need of this though. Why not simply use portsnap if you are not actively developing ports? -- - Frank
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?87mww00w89.fsf>