Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 10:10:18 +0300 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> To: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> Cc: "freebsd-performance@freebsd.org" <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Network performance comparison of DragonflyBSD, FreeBSD and Linux Message-ID: <20170307071018.GP15630@zxy.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <58BE0984.4070208@quip.cz> References: <58BE0984.4070208@quip.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 02:14:44AM +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > There is some comparison of DragonflyBSD, FreeBSD and two versions of > Linux in specific network benchmark - HTTP/1.1 short lived connections. > FreeBSD is the worst in this test. > > https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2017/03/06/19425.html > > https://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~sephe/perfcomp/1K.png > https://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~sephe/perfcomp/8K.png > https://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~sephe/perfcomp/16K.png > > https://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~sephe/perf_cmp.pdf Is this you test? I mean some congestion in file/page access layer on FreeBSD, can you re-test w/ about 1000 different files? I.e. every client request http://server/X_K.bin~1 http://server/X_K.bin~2 .... http://server/X_K.bin~1000 not just http://server/X_K.bin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20170307071018.GP15630>