Date: Wed, 25 Oct 1995 09:36:01 +0100 (MET) From: Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr> To: jmb@kryten.atinc.com (Jonathan M. Bresler) Cc: jkh@time.cdrom.com, gary@palmer.demon.co.uk, chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: moving some mail. Message-ID: <199510250836.JAA22840@keltia.freenix.fr> In-Reply-To: <Pine.3.89.9510242035.A18207-0100000@kryten.atinc.com> from "Jonathan M. Bresler" at Oct 24, 95 08:13:40 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
It seems that Jonathan M. Bresler said: > each subscription would need to be assigned to a regional mail > hub. assignments should be made on the basis of connectivity between the > destination and the regional mail hub (all regional mail hubs must be > well connected to freefall, else they aint gonna be regional hubs). the > assignments may need to be redone every XX days/weeks as net-topology > changes. Like Bill has said, it is the paradigm used Usenet. It works but it is much slower than mail (even with the timeouts). The vast majority of sites are three or four hops away from the other. Usenet can make it more then twenty... > > 15904 bytes received in 2.5e+02 seconds (0.061 Kbytes/s) > > 61 bytes/sec.....that is obscene. More and more common between the US and Europe these days... On the morning in Europe you can move bytes a little bit faster but it fells down fast during the day. -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- The daemon is FREE! -=- roberto@keltia.frmug.fr.net FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 2.2-CURRENT #2: Sun Oct 22 20:22:48 MET 1995
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199510250836.JAA22840>