Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 14 Nov 2007 05:25:21 +0900 (JST)
From:      Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org>
To:        royce@alaska.net
Cc:        kris@FreeBSD.org, sparc64@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: hardware and package builds
Message-ID:  <20071114.052521.135026097.hrs@allbsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <47348106.8080001@alaska.net>
References:  <472DAFBE.9070603@FreeBSD.org> <472E4B8D.2020902@alaska.net> <47348106.8080001@alaska.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
----Security_Multipart(Wed_Nov_14_05_25_21_2007_820)--
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi Royce, sorry for the delay.  I was in Ireland last week and the
very poor internet connection in the hotel prevented me from
replying...

Royce Williams <royce@alaska.net> wrote
  in <47348106.8080001@alaska.net>:

ro> Royce Williams wrote, on 11/4/2007 1:45 PM:
ro> > System: I am willing to buy a 4x U80 for myself and make it available
ro> > to the project for package builds.  Shipping to Alaska is a bear, so
ro> > once the deal goes down, if any other donors could chip in to get it
ro> > shipped here, I would appreciate it.  I don't want to do this,
ro> > however, unless it will actually be useful -- and used.  Will it?
ro>
ro> After talking with Kris and Mark, it appears that the best bang for
ro> the buck is to help Hiroki Sato resolve outstanding hardware issues
ro> with his e4500s.  This will get 10-14 CPUs back online.
ro>
ro> Hiroki, what hardware or money do you need to get your e4500s back
ro> online, in order to improve the speed of package builds for sparc64?

 Well, let me explain the current situation of my e4500s first.  I
 have three e4500s with 10-14 CPUs online for experiment and package
 building now, but some of them are often down probably because some
 hardware failure.

 However, the problem is that I am not sure what component is broken
 precisely because most of the questionable symptoms occur even if
 POST successfully finished.  Maybe one of the reasons is we are using
 FreeBSD; I guess runtime hardware failure reporting is much more
 specific on Solaris.  I have to narrow down the problem and replace
 the failed components.

 Anyway, suppose I could identify the failed ones, I would need the
 replacement.  CPU board, modules, and memories are most questionable,
 so they would likely be needed.  Currently all of the boxes use
 400MHz w/ 8MB module (PN:X2580A).  Also, PCI I/O board (PN:X2632A)
 would help since we have very few options for Sbus SCSI HBA.

--
| Hiroki SATO

----Security_Multipart(Wed_Nov_14_05_25_21_2007_820)--
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBHOggxTyzT2CeTzy0RAuVKAKCBsn1X5I/7s3IadutxhtKWP+ZE7wCgh/Bk
sEfVkIlrbWkLdddtlTgYh1g=
=Sscb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

----Security_Multipart(Wed_Nov_14_05_25_21_2007_820)----



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071114.052521.135026097.hrs>