Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 08:58:13 -0700 (PDT) From: "Pedro F. Giffuni" <giffunip@tutopia.com> To: Olivier Smedts <olivier@gid0.org>, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> Cc: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: x11-toolkits/swt Message-ID: <1347379093.33512.YahooMailNeo@web113508.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <CABzXLYPHQvGX05037aHDBjZcD2MK82fNh1=e03CORpmv-xKGNQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <504ED5EC.6040804@FreeBSD.org> <CABzXLYPHQvGX05037aHDBjZcD2MK82fNh1=e03CORpmv-xKGNQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello guys;=0A=0A=0A----- Original Message -----=0A=A0...=0A> =0A> 2012/9/1= 1 Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>:=0A>> Now that we have a new version of = libxul in the ports tree, any plans of=0A>> upgrading swt to take advantag= e of it? I'd love to get the=0A>> vulnerabilities in the old version off o= f my daily periodic.=0A> =0A> Meanwhile, I've had success with x11-toolkits= /swt-devel for=0A> mail/davmail and java/eclipse (btw, for me eclipse compi= les only if=0A> swt-devel is installed, not swt).=0A> =0A=0AI think we can = safely replace x11-toolkits/swt with x11-toolkits/swt-devel.=0A=0AI would a= lso prefer to drop myself from maintainance of the swt port: I=0Aonly grabb= ed=A0it to make sure the updates would go to the -devel port=0Afirst.=0A=0A= =0APedro.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1347379093.33512.YahooMailNeo>