Date: Tue, 13 Feb 1996 09:28:36 -0800 (PST) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@GndRsh.aac.dev.com> To: se@ZPR.Uni-Koeln.DE (Stefan Esser) Cc: gibbs@freefall.freebsd.org, rjk@sparcmill.grauel.com, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: One problem && one question Message-ID: <199602131728.JAA02469@GndRsh.aac.dev.com> In-Reply-To: <199602131630.AA09319@Sysiphos> from "Stefan Esser" at Feb 13, 96 05:30:13 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > On Feb 13, 8:10, "Justin T. Gibbs" wrote: > } Subject: Re: One problem && one question > } >On Feb 13, 9:39, Richard J Kuhns wrote: > } >} Subject: Re: One problem && one question > } >} Justin T. Gibbs writes: > } >} > Patch round two: > } >} > } >} Sorry, still no cigar. I rebooted this machine several times this morning, > } >} trying to copy the boot messages. I guess I'd better set up a minimal > } >} configuration to test this so the bt messages will remain on-screen. > } >} > } >} At any rate, I believe it looked like: > } >} > } >} <Buslogic id info> int a irq 10 pci 0:13 > } >} mapreg[10] type 1 addr 0x00006000 size ffff0004 > } >} bt0: Invalid base address > } > > } >The region size calculation seems broken! > } > } The driver only cares about the I/O port, which isn't reported above. I've > } seen boot -v output from bt946 cards before, and they at least report a > } sane I/O port address like 0x330 (when listed as a device without a driver) > > The BIOS is free to assign any port address, and > 0x330 seems to be reasonable to emulate the ISA > version of the card ... And if you have a revision E card and turn off the ISA ``assign standard I/O port'' in the bios it will come up with something in the more normal PCI I/O address range. -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com Accurate Automation Company Reliable computers for FreeBSD
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199602131728.JAA02469>