Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 03 Feb 1998 20:31:33 +0200
From:      Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za>
To:        Luigi Rizzo <luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it>
Cc:        multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG, hasty@rah.star-gate.com
Subject:   Re: bt848 feedback... 
Message-ID:  <199802031831.UAA25042@greenpeace.grondar.za>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> In the latest release of the Bt848 code, I noticed the BT848_I2CWR
> ioctl that I submitted some time ago has been put in video_ioctl(),
> but it really belongs in tuner_ioctl() , where other I2C devices are
> also accessed.

Dammit. My fault. Sorry.

> It's just a matter of moving the block in the other function (and
> moving the variable declarations at the beginning of video_ioctl,
> a hundred lines above... what was wrong with declaring variables
> within the block they are used, as in the patch I submitted!).

Please try to keep your coding style consistent with the existing code. 
There is nothing technically wrong with having the variables in the 
place you put them; however
> 
> Oh btw the code works perfectly on 2.2.1
> 
> 	cheers
> 	luigi
> -----------------------------+--------------------------------------
> Luigi Rizzo                  |  Dip. di Ingegneria dell'Informazione
> email: luigi@iet.unipi.it    |  Universita' di Pisa
> tel: +39-50-568533           |  via Diotisalvi 2, 56126 PISA (Italy)
> fax: +39-50-568522           |  http://www.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/
> _____________________________|______________________________________
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199802031831.UAA25042>