Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 18:26:12 -0700 From: "Sam Leffler" <sam@errno.com> To: "SUZUKI Shinsuke" <suz@kame.net> Cc: "Julian Elischer" <julian@elischer.org>, <freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>, <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>, <core@kame.net> Subject: Re: CFR: m_tag patch Message-ID: <1f3601c26f32$daf85170$52557f42@errno.com> References: <13e901c26dbb$63059f60$52557f42@errno.com><Pine.BSF.4.21.0210062329200.22932-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> <x77kgsct19.wl@s30.crl.hitachi.co.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> But from the KAME maintenance point of view I request only one thing
> regarding this.
>
> Please keep the m_tag design same as OpenBSD (i.e. I'd like to
> avoid changes such as change of member name in m_tag
> structure, behavior-change etc, to prevent inessential merging
> effort among *BSDs)
>
> If this condition is accepted, then we have no problem in adopting
> m_tag in FreeBSD-KAME.
> (as far as I looked though, there is no necessity of such change in
> m_tag architecture, but if you have some difficulties, please let me
> know.)
>
It will be compatible at the source level. That was the intention from the
start.
Sam
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1f3601c26f32$daf85170$52557f42>