Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 6 Aug 2020 19:21:28 +0000 (UTC)
From:      Paul Pathiakis <pathiaki2@yahoo.com>
To:        Jacques Foucry <jacques+freebsd@foucry.net>, Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Question re ZFS with mixed drive speeds & types
Message-ID:  <1535400648.1041648.1596741688161@mail.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <20200805204546.d1bf410e.freebsd@edvax.de>
References:  <575C4647-8F20-4187-9B74-2D509D31A249@gmail.com> <4fefedad-5b2a-11b8-7b22-3b6162f0404f@holgerdanske.com> <20200805182636.GD48435@mithril> <20200805204546.d1bf410e.freebsd@edvax.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
 Wow.... someone as old as me... :)
I had no idea.=C2=A0 I remember a lot of those applications in an OS that w=
ere based on this theory.=C2=A0 I believe there were even a few that indexe=
d tape drives with UNIX i-nodes.=C2=A0 Good times..... :)
P.

    On Wednesday, August 5, 2020, 2:46:06 PM EDT, Polytropon <freebsd@edvax=
.de> wrote: =20
=20
 On Wed, 5 Aug 2020 20:26:36 +0200, Jacques Foucry wrote:
> Le mercredi 05 ao=C3=BBt 2020 =C3=A0 01:32:02 (-0700), David Christensen =
=C3=A0 =C3=A9crit:
> > On 2020-08-04 23:55, Greg Marsh wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > I ask because about 10 years ago, I was involved in a project that ha=
d a HUGE storage component. Many of the vendors we brought in to pitch, inc=
luding Sun, were promoting tiered storage. Sun in particular were quite pro=
ud of this tech. Their system ran ZFS and had a hybrid of ssd, sas & SATA, =
with the system dynamically moving data around the different speed/capacity=
 drives, based on their activity, all transparent to the application or use=
r. Most often used data coming from the ssd & sas drives, with less active =
files kept on the SATA drives.
>=20
>=20
> I remember the same thing when Sun demostrate us ZFS (I was a Sunkskill a=
t
> this time). But I never tried.

Sounds a bit like HSM - hierarchical storage management,
implemented on IBM mainframe systems (DFHSM) and on
DEC VMS for VAX and Alpha, also has been implemented
on AIX and other UNIX operating systems.

So decades old stuff is "new" again... ;-)




--=20
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org=
" =20
From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org  Thu Aug  6 20:33:01 2020
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
 by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEF043AA2D4
 for <freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org>;
 Thu,  6 Aug 2020 20:33:01 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from greg.marsh@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82c.google.com (mail-qt1-x82c.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82c])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256
 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256)
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BN0YT0893z4Yb4
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu,  6 Aug 2020 20:33:00 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from greg.marsh@gmail.com)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82c.google.com with SMTP id c12so28409499qtn.9
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 13:33:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc
 :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to;
 bh=1IjaQske7P21y4TY79jJ9voHUqWCQv/TbeujpgS2MLE=;
 b=dakUOp/IsruY+BtYph/TdtQlZCnqLiqBICD/YdwQHWqkMF3x7E7Wf72URzzgPxrH6I
 wXEiGJsI3R1gEvprqabAr2YHA1YW0HBXKjXzGErZd4cWDBjJJ+sy+8MgpbXaeSJVXmJF
 5MO0ICGbuWIGStH25KRLIBzuKUej/f+2hJnUJnj1XwhKwLyFyGC2xLj+oJMtj5B+6NGR
 U1QRaOK+4FUI/szI7McI3na6OTT/r8tdcuZH25DwNH6H0sciPsifHrzdD7DPjsLTFKYe
 1ZXBLeTxLoWVP4whVEIc8ulyxhiJ/QbLgEjygsZBSeaJYkMEG5h6CcdJ7hUHedua/Fq6
 qRlQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc
 :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to;
 bh=1IjaQske7P21y4TY79jJ9voHUqWCQv/TbeujpgS2MLE=;
 b=on/SjxEQ9/BB6Ot5KOpEaoB3L/ln0QBe2/9UyBb8NyIuZ0qV64I0RHyz+9nD0dsbIT
 lgv4WWIubyZ1PIqZ3NNZbV7LdlnrEc8YQ7pQTwsRp2RfyxhEdmGkxIho8TRcJISlM9mm
 FEMfzVtUKHQYxaQW+qs0ifeoVdLcxhTL4fZQMDKk6k+WsXjeusTFW5YJMUEF2/yvEe+D
 3PFLLIhWKSw+v58SKUFHzHJXTU2DFf+uTdGoLUTG7oY5Hb2/1d7qypz+qDdF4VMN4u++
 axQ27AwRsB3tu/3hCRgHoVuU/uMCi69l5xjjAXgfMog49YAHvPH2CDUb9u4YA3mTtTQX
 WRtQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5326eDa+f7uBIrS3L6c/bM42CL302U3TS7WW2JkH1HAtVs3HVM94
 O+xZ6nN9ILI2vtvHBLBy+A8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx6EzTIYCRLY41tSo7O/8varT1LXdl005VXhU+KzIwAwX8mCDRxkD+mU+LaYTqxFFcSmjiBMQ==
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:4c9a:: with SMTP id j26mr10497491qtv.373.1596745979858; 
 Thu, 06 Aug 2020 13:32:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [25.108.17.155] ([24.114.48.200])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g49sm6073057qtk.74.2020.08.06.13.32.58
 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Thu, 06 Aug 2020 13:32:59 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: Question re ZFS with mixed drive speeds & types
From: Greg Marsh <greg.marsh@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (16G183)
In-Reply-To: <1535400648.1041648.1596741688161@mail.yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2020 16:32:55 -0400
Cc: Jacques Foucry <jacques+freebsd@foucry.net>,
 Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <039ADEB2-9BE6-4407-89FF-5FAC160102A1@gmail.com>
References: <575C4647-8F20-4187-9B74-2D509D31A249@gmail.com>
 <4fefedad-5b2a-11b8-7b22-3b6162f0404f@holgerdanske.com>
 <20200805182636.GD48435@mithril> <20200805204546.d1bf410e.freebsd@edvax.de>
 <1535400648.1041648.1596741688161@mail.yahoo.com>
To: Paul Pathiakis <pathiaki2@yahoo.com>
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BN0YT0893z4Yb4
X-Spamd-Bar: -
Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org;
 dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=dakUOp/I;
 dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com;
 spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of gregmarsh@gmail.com designates
 2607:f8b0:4864:20::82c as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=gregmarsh@gmail.com
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.62 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[];
 TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com];
 MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36];
 RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+];
 DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none];
 NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.55)[-0.555]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[yahoo.com];
 FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+];
 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com];
 ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US];
 MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[];
 DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[];
 NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.06)[-1.063];
 R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025];
 RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[24.114.48.200:received];
 FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4];
 NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.997]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[freebsd];
 MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain];
 PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org];
 TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[];
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::82c:from];
 RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS(1.50)[]
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>;
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2020 20:33:01 -0000

Thank you all for your input and memories. I=E2=80=99m glad to hear I=E2=80=99=
m not hallucinating having recalled said storage sales pitches. =3D)

I suspect what I=E2=80=99ll end up doing is migrating my current array to th=
e new system, then experiment with adding mixed drives to a second, testing a=
rray.=20

When I started in IT, it was in a big VAX/Alpha OpenVMS using company. The p=
rogrammers couldn=E2=80=99t stop talking about how lighting fast the RMS fil=
e/record storage system was. I was just an operator at the time.=20
But, when I saw the circulation system (I worked at a newspaper) move from a=
 single Alpha 233 to a dual 2 GHz Xeon running Linux and ProgressDB move waa=
aay slower, was I convinced there had to be better ways.=20
To be fair, I generally blame the crappy off the shelf program that replaced=
 a decades old, in house developed one.


Cheers,
Greg

Sent from my iPhone

> On Aug 6, 2020, at 15:21, Paul Pathiakis via freebsd-questions <freebsd-qu=
estions@freebsd.org> wrote:
>=20
> Wow.... someone as old as me... :)
> I had no idea.  I remember a lot of those applications in an OS that were b=
ased on this theory.  I believe there were even a few that indexed tape driv=
es with UNIX i-nodes.  Good times..... :)
> P.
>=20
>    On Wednesday, August 5, 2020, 2:46:06 PM EDT, Polytropon <freebsd@edvax=
.de> wrote: =20
>=20
> On Wed, 5 Aug 2020 20:26:36 +0200, Jacques Foucry wrote:
>> Le mercredi 05 ao=C3=BBt 2020 =C3=A0 01:32:02 (-0700), David Christensen =C3=
=A0 =C3=A9crit:
>>> On 2020-08-04 23:55, Greg Marsh wrote:
>>>> [...]
>>>> I ask because about 10 years ago, I was involved in a project that had a=
 HUGE storage component. Many of the vendors we brought in to pitch, includi=
ng Sun, were promoting tiered storage. Sun in particular were quite proud of=
 this tech. Their system ran ZFS and had a hybrid of ssd, sas & SATA, with t=
he system dynamically moving data around the different speed/capacity drives=
, based on their activity, all transparent to the application or user. Most o=
ften used data coming from the ssd & sas drives, with less active files kept=
 on the SATA drives.
>>=20
>>=20
>> I remember the same thing when Sun demostrate us ZFS (I was a Sunkskill a=
t
>> this time). But I never tried.
>=20
> Sounds a bit like HSM - hierarchical storage management,
> implemented on IBM mainframe systems (DFHSM) and on
> DEC VMS for VAX and Alpha, also has been implemented
> on AIX and other UNIX operating systems.
>=20
> So decades old stuff is "new" again... ;-)
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> --=20
> Polytropon
> Magdeburg, Germany
> Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
> Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.or=
g" =20
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.or=
g"



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1535400648.1041648.1596741688161>