Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      18 May 2004 18:08:31 -0000
From:      tmseck-lists@netcologne.de (Thomas-Martin Seck)
To:        Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ports subtree dependencies checking
Message-ID:  <20040518180831.1218.qmail@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org>
In-Reply-To: <20040518152749.M52881@woozle.rinet.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru> [gmane.os.freebsd.devel.ports]:

> as all of you knows, keeping up to date thw whole ports tree involves
> tremendous number of disk operation per cvs/cvsup. So, I use small script to
> keep up-to date rather small set of ports (less than 1000, comparing to 10k+
> total ports in the tree).

Have a look at misc/porteasy. I use it to maintain my local subset of
the ports tree via anoncvs and am quite happy with it:

% wc -l /usr/ports/INDEX.pkgtools
     252 /usr/ports/INDEX.pkgtools

(INDEX.pkgtools is the result of portsdb -U, I keep the original INDEX
too to see what ports might be worth looking at.)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040518180831.1218.qmail>