Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2007 20:12:23 +0100 From: Jorn Argelo <jorn@wcborstel.com> To: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: What's the point of the shell choice in single user mode? Message-ID: <47545517.9040302@wcborstel.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------010602000808010409030401
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
--------------010602000808010409030401
Content-Type: message/rfc822;
name="Re: What's the point of the shell choice in single user
mode?.eml"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline;
filename*0="Re: What's the point of the shell choice in single user
mode"; filename*1="?.eml"
Message-ID: <47545166.8040307@wcborstel.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2007 19:56:38 +0100
From: Jorn Argelo <jorn@wcborstel.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@riderway.com>
Subject: Re: What's the point of the shell choice in single user mode?
References: <20071201044427.38bd2c84@asus.freeode.co.uk> <20071201061813.2a0e35e2@gumby.homeunix.com.> <20071201140619.4b7332ba@asus.freeode.co.uk> <4752EFF1.9050107@wcborstel.com> <20071203181412.709fab80@gumby.homeunix.com.> <4754500D.8070706@wcborstel.com>
<4754508E.30802@riderway.com>
In-Reply-To: <4754508E.30802@riderway.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="------------070409050208010100020505"
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------070409050208010100020505
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> Jorn Argelo wrote:
>
>> RW wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 18:48:33 +0100
>>> Jorn Argelo <jorn@wcborstel.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Also note that vi doesn't work by default as it needs to write
>>>> to /tmp. So mount /tmp or re-mount / to RW permissions.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I think vi will also fail unless it has access to termcap, so you'd
>>> need /usr mounted too.
>>>
>>>
>> You'd need to mount /usr anyway, as the vi binary is located in /usr/bin ;-)
>>
> *cough* /rescue/vi
>
>
Ah good point, forgot about that one.
Cheers
--------------070409050208010100020505
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Jorn Argelo wrote:
RW wrote:
On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 18:48:33 +0100
Jorn Argelo [1]<jorn@wcborstel.com> wrote:
Also note that vi doesn't work by default as it needs to write
to /tmp. So mount /tmp or re-mount / to RW permissions.
I think vi will also fail unless it has access to termcap, so you'd
need /usr mounted too.
You'd need to mount /usr anyway, as the vi binary is located in /usr/bin ;-)
*cough* /rescue/vi
Ah good point, forgot about that one.
Cheers
References
1. mailto:jorn@wcborstel.com
--------------070409050208010100020505--
--------------010602000808010409030401--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47545517.9040302>