Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 13:13:43 -0700 From: Donald Wilde <dwilde1@thuntek.net> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no> Cc: freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: License nightmare Message-ID: <36ED69F7.9F4BEA9F@thuntek.net> References: <36ED1F21.12E97D6D@thuntek.net> <xzpogluo9e0.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <36ED68D6.C7820CAD@thuntek.net> <xzp90cyms12.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > Donald Wilde <dwilde1@thuntek.net> writes: > > Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > > Donald Wilde <dwilde1@thuntek.net> writes: > > > > If GNU gcc is GPL, is FreeBSD in violation, or is it just 'including > > > > source' and not 'using' that requires disclosure of sources? > > > Where did you get the idea that we did not distribute the gcc sources? > > No, I mean the sources of code that is generated with gcc. The GPL could > > be interpreted to mean that binaries created using gcc as a tool are > > subject to the license. If I'm just having bad dreams needlessly, please > > tell me so. :-) > > Richard Stallman has very specificly stated that this is not the case. > wonderful, thanks a lot! -- oooOOO O O O o * * * * * * o ___ _________ _________ _________ ___==__ V_=_=_DW ===--- Don Wilde dwilde1@thuntek.net [ = = ] /oo0000oo-oo--oo-ooo---ooo-ooo---ooo-ooo---ooo-oo---oo To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?36ED69F7.9F4BEA9F>