Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 01:25:59 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@NUXI.com> To: Dirk Froemberg <dirk@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/sysutils/mkisofs112 Makefile ports/sysutils/mkisofs112/files md5 ports/sysutils/mkisofs112/patches patch-ag patch-ac patch-af ports/sysutils/mkisofs112/pkg PLIST Message-ID: <19990223012559.A29806@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <199902221348.FAA40049@freefall.freebsd.org>; from Dirk Froemberg on Mon, Feb 22, 1999 at 05:48:45AM -0800 References: <199902221348.FAA40049@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> sysutils/mkisofs112 Makefile ... > Log: > Upgrade to 1.12b4 after repository copy. I really hate having several versions of small utilities in ports. I just confuses users. IMHO, it is only OK, if the package is a well known program with real differences between versions that will cause people to have a preference to stick with the older version. I killed mkhybrid12 for this reason. That said, why not just updated the mkisofs port?? It has no maintainer. I also note that mkisofs112 has no maintainer and thus will rot. I propose that either (1) you become offical maintainer of mkisofs112 and track its versions, or (2) trash mkisofs112 and update mkisofs. > This version has support for joliet filesystems, now. mkhybrid has this, so what does mkisofs112 add? -- -- David (obrien@NUXI.com -or- obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990223012559.A29806>