Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 23:22:01 -0600 From: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> To: Mike Jakubik <mikej@rogers.com> Cc: FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>, stable@freebsd.org, "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@freebsd.org>, Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>, noackjr@alumni.rice.edu Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.1 Released Message-ID: <44641B79.9000300@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <44640422.1000006@rogers.com> References: <44600A42.7030600@samsco.org> <44601F4A.9070802@elischer.org> <446021DE.6040507@rogers.com> <20060511210912.GA1344@zaphod.nitro.dk> <4463DC96.70908@rogers.com> <446402BB.7050201@alumni.rice.edu> <44640422.1000006@rogers.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mike Jakubik wrote: > Jonathan Noack wrote: > >> The *entire* errata page was from 6.0; it was a mistake. This wasn't >> some "put on the rose-colored classes and gloss over major issues" >> thing. It was a long release cycle and something was forgotten. C'est >> la vie. It's always a good idea to check the most up-to-date version of >> the errata page on the web anyway, so it's *not* too late to update it. >> >> > > > How convenient. These problems needed to be addressed in the release > notes, not some on line version. > >> So, you're still waiting for Scott to personally fix the problems and he >> couldn't deliver? Huh? I quote you >> (http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2006-May/025209.html): >> "Scott, thanks for the very generous gesture, but i cant ask you >> something like this." >> > > > He emailed me personally, i accepted his help offer, never heard from > him since. > Sorry, things got lost in the shuffle to get this released. For your specific snapshot deadlocks, please test the changes that have gone into 7-CURRENT and report back if they fix your problem. Only with active testing will we know if they are good to be backported in time for 6.2. Scott
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44641B79.9000300>