Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 00:45:41 -0800 From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" <tedm@toybox.placo.com> To: "Jeffrey Goldberg" <jeffrey@goldmark.org>, =?iso-8859-1?B?S/Z2ZXNk4W4gR+Fib3I=?= <gabor.kovesdan@t-hosting.hu> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Licensing question about GPL/LGPL binaries Message-ID: <001201c757f0$2ba91fa0$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> References: <45DED5B6.9020309@t-hosting.hu> <CC493214-CE69-49D6-AF00-C3D62CF8780C@goldmark.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeffrey Goldberg" <jeffrey@goldmark.org> To: "Kövesdán Gábor" <gabor.kovesdan@t-hosting.hu> Cc: <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 9:02 AM Subject: Re: Licensing question about GPL/LGPL binaries > [freebsd-emulation cut from cc] > > > On Feb 23, 2007, at 5:53 AM, Kövesdán Gábor wrote: > > > The question is that can we extract and provide these binaries in a > > simple tar.gz file or is that considered a GPL/LGPL violation? The > > sources are freely available on slackware.com, but we are not sure > > doing so is legally correct. What do you think about this? > > Gábor, > > What you plan to do is perfectly fine under the GPL as long as > > (1) What you distribute is under the GPL license > (2) You let people know where they can freely get the source > (3) You don't take credit for work that isn't yours. > Jeffrey, Kovesdan is not modifying the binaries or the sources, thus there is no need for him to GPL license his distribution - the files in his distribution already carry their own GPL license. He just needs to include all of the files, which by GPL requirement, are going to include a copies of the GPL licenses that are applied to those files, as well as instructions as to where to get the sources. He does not need to further apply some kind of 'overall' GPL license to his distribution. It's a similar issue as someone running an FTP server with GPL software on it, they are merely serving as a venue for the distribution. It's a fine point to be sure, but an important one espically as the FSF is aiming to have multiple, incompatible, versions of the GPL floating around. Ted
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?001201c757f0$2ba91fa0$3c01a8c0>