Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 18:40:46 +0200 From: Max Laier <max@love2party.net> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Cc: Muhammad Reza <reza@mra.co.id> Subject: Re: pf and ipfw Message-ID: <200408091840.53308.max@love2party.net> In-Reply-To: <411722A1.1020108@mra.co.id> References: <411722A1.1020108@mra.co.id>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Boundary-02=_Vk6FB2BS8tKqjix Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 09 August 2004 09:07, Muhammad Reza wrote: > Dear Lists, > > can pf rule work together with ipfw rules ? > i need pf rule to do some outgoing load balance, but still need ipfw to > do some basic packet filtering, cause i have difficulty to set pf rules > default to block if it's apply with load balancing rules. > please enlight me.. While it is possible to use pf and ipfw in conjunction, it is certainly=20 preferable to settle for either one on its own. It should not be too much o= f=20 a problem to get pf to do what you want/need. If you have more specific=20 questions you can post to pf4freebsd@freelists.org =2D-=20 /"\ Best regards, | mlaier@freebsd.org \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News --Boundary-02=_Vk6FB2BS8tKqjix Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBF6kVXyyEoT62BG0RAub7AJ9k33v+UUYwZLVX1p1xCmkz2ql/RwCffkAj Wleq1V0CeF7IyKWuXBJGipk= =nn7H -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_Vk6FB2BS8tKqjix--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200408091840.53308.max>