Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 16:34:46 +0200 From: Ulrich Spoerlein <uspoerlein@gmail.com> To: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com> Cc: mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Making progress on if_bfe - fixed! Message-ID: <20060529143446.GC1117@roadrunner.q.local> In-Reply-To: <20060528134625.B743@odysseus.silby.com> References: <20060527135922.C7405@odysseus.silby.com> <20060528134625.B743@odysseus.silby.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--+nBD6E3TurpgldQp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mike Silbersack wrote: > Well, I think it's finally fixed this time. I just committed changes to = both if_bfe and to=20 > the busdma subsystem for i386 and amd64. >=20 > The reason changing if_bfereg.h affected things is because changing the R= X/TX list sizes was=20 > changing how they were aligned, and the broadcom 4400 series cares deeply= about how things=20 > are aligned. >=20 > Please cvsup and tell me how it goes (good or bad.) I only have =3D1GB, but there are other bugs in if_bfe(4). I'd be glad if you could take a peek at kern/98015. Thanks! Ulrich Spoerlein --=20 PGP Key ID: 20FEE9DD Encrypted mail welcome! Fingerprint: AEC9 AF5E 01AC 4EE1 8F70 6CBD E76E 2227 20FE E9DD Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? Don't know. Don't care. --+nBD6E3TurpgldQp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEewaG524iJyD+6d0RAiIoAKCPMuwS7v6tC+BR2fUoTnD0zb9prgCeMZ1x HFY77QJ1FaZp1mqjJzbq/8w= =+faG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --+nBD6E3TurpgldQp--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060529143446.GC1117>