Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 00:54:17 -0800 From: Yuri <yuri@freebsd.org> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r455079 - in head/net-im/ricochet: . files Message-ID: <8627a4da-69f7-4993-ba8f-6e96e69fca9d@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20171129065128.GA71839@FreeBSD.org> References: <201711282137.vASLbFPV093863@repo.freebsd.org> <20171129065128.GA71839@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/28/17 22:51, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> I don't get it: if Tor is*required* for ${PORTNAME} to run (per TOR_DESC),
> why not simply remove the option and use normal RUN_DEPENDS?
>
> If it, under some circumstances, is*not required* to run, then TOR_DESC
> should be reworded. Now it is just plain confusing.
Sorry, I didn't notice your message before.
Tor is required for ricochet, so the message is correct.
However, some people want to run custom versions of Tor, therefore it is
optional.
It doesn't look confusing to me. It is required, but there are other
ways to run Tor than the official Tor port.
Yuri
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8627a4da-69f7-4993-ba8f-6e96e69fca9d>