Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 17:46:53 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> To: Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org> Cc: swills@freebsd.org, office@freebsd.org, ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de Subject: Re: ports/160481: devel/icu: Errors in total: 1. TestCompilerRTTI UObjectTest utility CLANG build failure Message-ID: <20120116164653.GD4729@azathoth.lan> In-Reply-To: <CADLo83-gg2XsRyxAkzCR4xxijmK5L1dT-itaAT8Hjvhhtq0zVQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <201201152157.q0FLvpUw092665@freefall.freebsd.org> <20120116124247.GC4729@azathoth.lan> <CADLo83-gg2XsRyxAkzCR4xxijmK5L1dT-itaAT8Hjvhhtq0zVQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--EP0wieDxd4TSJjHq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 01:04:50PM +0000, Chris Rees wrote: > On 16 Jan 2012 12:42, "Baptiste Daroussin" <bapt@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > > On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 09:57:51PM +0000, crees@FreeBSD.org wrote: > > > Synopsis: devel/icu: Errors in total: 1. TestCompilerRTTI > UObjectTest utility CLANG build failure > > > > > > State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->open > > > State-Changed-By: crees > > > State-Changed-When: Sun Jan 15 21:57:46 UTC 2012 > > > State-Changed-Why: > > > I'll take it. > > > > > > > > > Responsible-Changed-From-To: office->crees > > > Responsible-Changed-By: crees > > > Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Jan 15 21:57:46 UTC 2012 > > > Responsible-Changed-Why: > > > I'll take it. > > > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D160481 > > > _______________________________________________ > > > freebsd-office@freebsd.org mailing list > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-office > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-office-unsubscribe@freebsd.= org > " > > > > In my concern this is hidding a bug under the carpet not fixing it, FYI > the bug > > has been fixed on amd64, still being working on for i386. > > > > imho this shouldn't be committed unless we have an upstream approval th= at > this > > is actually the fix (which I'm not sure of) no offense to the submitter. > > > > The fact that it now works with clang on amd64 proves (imho) that the > current > > code should be working, and that is fix isn't a real fix. > > >=20 > Thanks, I wasn't aware you'd brought it up with upstream already. >=20 > If you're in touch with upstream, would you like me to pass it to you so > you can track it? >=20 > Chris I'm not in touch with upstream in that particular case, but some clang peop= le are regards, Bapt --EP0wieDxd4TSJjHq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk8UVH0ACgkQ8kTtMUmk6ExN/ACdHBAsgLnJXzdKMqDoSInTHGXQ PdkAnjuY8tIeskxIDtFHWnJtPp10BlUI =rLoQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --EP0wieDxd4TSJjHq--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120116164653.GD4729>