Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 11:51:56 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Chris <chrcoluk@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Linking problems with gcc 3.4.2 and glibc on 5.3-stable Message-ID: <20050126195156.GA10988@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <3aaaa3a0501260403611abe49@mail.gmail.com> References: <20050126104801.30643.qmail@web54008.mail.yahoo.com> <3aaaa3a0501260403611abe49@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 12:03:28PM +0000, Chris wrote: > there is also a bug which prevents compiling of ezbounce and psybnc, I > wonder how much testing went into the new gcc compiler or was it just > bundled into the release, considering this is the reccommended release > for production server's now this is a bad oversight. If you're going to make assertions of negligence, back them up with facts or you just come across as trying to stir up trouble. What problems? How would you suggest we prove that the next version of gcc is free from bugs before we "bundle it into the release" (and maybe you should also tell the gcc people as I'm sure they'd also love to know)? Kris --LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB9/TcWry0BWjoQKURAqZrAJ4rkEQps9D9iRbw1sTkkfzoGfCK9ACcCGOH Ou37iCvtdsbGTvN6jsUNaVg= =P52h -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050126195156.GA10988>