Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 19:02:36 +0300 From: Alex Kozlov <spam@rm-rf.kiev.ua> To: Alex Dupre <ale@FreeBSD.org>, Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org>, ports@freebsd.org, spam@rm-rf.kiev.ua Subject: Re: Standardize NO_CCACHE flag and ccache definitions Message-ID: <20080618160236.GA39588@ravenloft.kiev.ua>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 05:48:38PM +0200, Alex Dupre wrote: > Alex Kozlov ha scritto: > >> It's necessary if you don't want to use ccache only for 1% of the > >> buildworld process. > > I use CCACHE_NOHASH_SIZE_MTIME: > > "It's not necessary to use CCACHE_HASH_COMPILER" != "I use > CCACHE_NOHASH_SIZE_MTIME, so every compiler I use I will get always the > same result." Problem in make buildworld case is not compiler name. Problem is that compiler rebuild itself and mtime alway different. So I'm use switch exactly for this case and not depend on side effects CCACHE_HASH_COMPILER. Also later is undocumented. -- Adios
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080618160236.GA39588>