Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 16 Aug 2004 16:54:55 -0500
From:      "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net>
To:        "Joe Marcus Clarke" <marcus@marcuscom.com>
Cc:        FreeBSD GNOME Users <gnome@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Current problem reports assigned to you
Message-ID:  <opscuhtteg9aq2h7@mezz>
In-Reply-To: <1092692124.725.42.camel@gyros>
References:  <200408161103.i7GB3RT0097632@freefall.freebsd.org> <opscufz72n9aq2h7@mezz> <1092692124.725.42.camel@gyros>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 17:36:14 -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke  
<marcus@marcuscom.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 2004-08-16 at 17:15, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
>> On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 11:03:27 GMT, FreeBSD bugmaster
>> <bugmaster@freebsd.org> wrote:
>>
>> > Current FreeBSD problem reports
>> > Critical problems
>> > Serious problems
>> >
>> > S  Submitted   Tracker     Resp.       Description
>> >  
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > o [2004/08/12] ports/70343 gnome       libgtkhtml won't build
>>
>> Do anyone know what's wrong with this? I don't have any problem when I
>> built it.
>>
>> > o [2004/08/16] ports/70520 gnome       packaged version of epiphany  
>> has
>> > issues/d
>>
>> Dunno, will have to ask him what's wrong with his build via ports. Mix
>> with ports and packages are not recommend, however.
>
> These two can probably be closed.  His system has some problems.  None
> of these problems appear in a clean build, or a package install on a
> clean system off of the GNOME Tinderbox.
>
>>
>> > 2 problems total.
>> >
>> > Non-critical problems
>> >
>> > S  Submitted   Tracker     Resp.       Description
>> >  
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > o [2002/06/17] ports/39390 gnome       Make graphics/imlib not depend
>> > upon GTK+
>>
>> It has been sitting for more than two years, I think it's time to close
>> this PR. Agree? No reply, I will close it with my gut.
>
> Agree.
>
>>
>> > o [2004/01/04] ports/60876 gnome       x11/gdm2 sets overly-high  
>> display
>> > frequen
>>
>> I think, this PR can be close with tell him to update his FreeBSD and
>> GNOME2. Also, if his problem still exists, then contract to
>> gnome@FreeBSD.org. Agree?
>
> Yep.
>
>>
>> > o [2004/04/07] ports/65296 gnome       noise with esd a day later
>> > (audio/esound)
>>
>> Dunno.
>
> This is unreproduceable to me.  I would say find out if it still happens
> with 0.2.35, and if so, pursue it with the esound developers and/or the
> FreeBSD sound people.
>
>>
>> > o [2004/06/04] ports/67552 gnome       Teach fontconfig about gs fonts
>>
>> What do anyone think of this?
>
> I think this is pending some other updates.  You might want to ask the
> author about it.  I'm not opposed to doing what he suggests as long as X
> is in line with whatever we decide.

Ok, I also will ask why not install gs fonts in lib/X11/fonts. I personal  
rather to have all fonts in a place than multi-place.

>> > o [2004/06/15] ports/67970 gnome       ports textproc/libxml,
>> > textproc/libxslt:
>>
>> Well.......I personal don't care about this since pkgconfig is mofo  
>> small.
>> :-P I bet this one is going to take forever unless someone step in and
>> create the patch(es).
>
> I don't see why we need to get anymore clever with pkgconfig.  It is
> small, and is generally needed on any desktop system.

In case if anyone want to know my real thought of this PR. I disagree with  
this PR, because the purpose of install foo.pc is to run 'pkg-config  
--options foo'. Therefore, pkgconfig should be install.

Tonight or tomorrow, I will start to touch some PRs.

Cheers,
Mezz

>> > o [2004/07/07] ports/68747 gnome       [patch] upgrade print/freetype2
>>
>> How is it so far with the test? Does it still mess up the pretty font or
>> what? All I know is that future xorg will need the new freetype2 or it
>> can't be build.
>
> This needs to be suspended.  The update to 2.1.9 can't happen right now
> since it breaks too many important ports.  X.Org was fixed to need 2.1.4
> or higher, so this is no longer an issue there.  I've tested the 2.1.9
> update, and while rendering is better, the API changes make it
> prohibitive right now.
>
>> > o [2004/07/09] ports/68879 gnome       [patch] update
>> > x11-toolkits/scintilla to
>>
>> Dunno, will have to check it. I don't really know scintilla that much.
>> Since, it breaks with scite then one of us will need to check scite
>> website to see if there has any of update that works with new scintilla.
>>
>> > o [2004/07/17] ports/69175 gnome       audio/esound: when the esound
>> > port is upg
>>
>> Umm, will need to make the changes to get this port respect the  
>> etc/*.conf.
>
> Yep.  This should be done.
>
>>
>> > o [2004/08/03] ports/69937 gnome       [PATCH] www/mozilla:  
>> Work-around
>> > for Mozi
>>
>> Someone will need to take a look at Mozilla CVS and create a patch for
>> this one. Or, wait until next Mozilla update.
>
> I'll handle this.
>
> Joe
>
>>
>> > o [2004/08/11] ports/70289 gnome       graphics/dia : dia.xpm is not
>> > installed
>>
>> I don't mind to check this, I will put dia.xpm in either  
>> share/gnome/dia/
>> or share/gnome/pixmaps/ instead.
>>
>>
>> I just input the comments above to see if anyone agree. Also, I will  
>> like
>> to see us to reduce all of those PRs. ;-)
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Mezz
>>
>> > 10 problems total.


-- 
mezz7@cox.net  -  mezz@FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD GNOME Team
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?opscuhtteg9aq2h7>