Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 2 Jul 2011 21:11:08 +0000
From:      "b. f." <bf1783@googlemail.com>
To:        Kevin Oberman <kob6558@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: libarchive, lzma, and xz interaction
Message-ID:  <CAGFTUwNKnLAY4tHT-kC6z_8dV72GzvZA6FHebO2c=_1vV1NTGQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAN6yY1tN7r2zzWqyOF1VcuVkBaFDDLSq6dL9g92e_fCCYyHHXw@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CAGFTUwNsL7mxy50R==nnk3kuqHQhVt0wPMXA5DaVNPZjeZqZyw@mail.gmail.com> <CAN6yY1tN7r2zzWqyOF1VcuVkBaFDDLSq6dL9g92e_fCCYyHHXw@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 7/2/11, Kevin Oberman <kob6558@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 11:32 PM, b. f. <bf1783@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Kevin Oberman <kob6558 at gmail.com>
...
> And you were right about the sequence o events. Due to a bug in the
> atkbd driver in 8.1 and 8.2 I installed 8.0-RELEASE and, after
> installing a few critical ports (which must have pulled in xz), I
> csuped RELENG_8, I applied the required patch (which has now been
> MFCed), and built a stable system. Unfortunately, I now had xz and got
> into the problems I reported.
>
> I am a bit disturbed to note that there is no entry in either
> /usr/src/UPDATING or /usr/ports/UPDATING about lzma moving into the
> base system and the need to re-install ports that had depended on the
> xz port and delete xz. While googling for the problem I found many
> reports of the problem with no solutions. A note in UPDATING (in this
> case, probably both of them, but at least /usr/src) could have made
> them easily resolved.

Yes, this probably should have been mentioned in UPDATING.  Oddly, it
did make it into the 8.1 Release Notes.  A complicating factor for
those using packages from the FreeBSD build cluster is that the
packages for 8* (i.e., packages-stable or packages-8-stable) are
usually built on some version of the oldest supported security branch
of 8, so for a period of time after the addition of xz to 8-stable
those packages included an unnecessary dependency on archivers/xz for
users of 8-stable, 8.1, and 8.1-stable.  Fortunately, in this case,
there probably wouldn't have been any adverse effects, other than a
small waste of space and some confusion.

b.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGFTUwNKnLAY4tHT-kC6z_8dV72GzvZA6FHebO2c=_1vV1NTGQ>