Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 11:21:22 -0500 From: "Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." <kdk@daleco.biz> To: Sigmascape1@cs.com Cc: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD and the future Message-ID: <41714A82.7010902@daleco.biz> In-Reply-To: <6567E5EF.2DED0AAD.3F8EDD3A@cs.com> References: <6567E5EF.2DED0AAD.3F8EDD3A@cs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sigmascape1@cs.com wrote: >I need to know if I can turn someone loose on FreeBSD that is not overly >computer literate... strictly word procesing, email and web surfing. > > It is rather trivial for someone who has a good working knowledge of FreeBSD to create a working environment that would be easy for the "average Joe" to do just these three tasks. That is, setting it up is somewhat advanced; *using* it is not. My case in point is a "little old lady" story: A former client who now comes in to do my billing and assorted chores for 4 hours each week. I've given her a FreeBSD machine to use for email, www, and word processing. Using GNOME (and gdm for a graphical login), she browses and reads mail with Mozilla and uses TextMaker (www.softmaker.de) for word processing. Given that she wasn't a power user when she used Windows, I'd say there's very little difference between the two systems as far as she is concerned, other than the fact that running GNOME 2.8, I really should get a faster CPU and more RAM in that boxen. I purchased TextMaker at a good discount last November; it's a nice package, but I imagine she could be using AbiWord or some similar, free alternative without much difficulty in making the switch. A graphical login. A graphical "desktop" environment with a "cascading" start menu and desktop icons for launching applications. It's a standard that most people are relatively familiar with, even if they have no idea what's going on behind the scenes. To make up a statistic for the sake of added weight, probably more than 3/4's of the Microsoft users I know are in the same boat ... >Also, in terms of server use, how much different would it be to set up >a FreeBSD server than setting up a SuSE Linux-based server. > > > IMHO, FBSD is easier, but I've touched Linux once; and it was about five minutes. And then, I don't know the SUSE installer, but you'd be getting back to that "installer shortcoming" argument again. Have you read Matthew Fuller's "linux and BSD" rant? It's at over-yonder.net IIRC; a quick Google search should turn it up. Far from being the ravings of an angry maniac, there's some stuff to be learned there in regard to the similarities and differences between the "typical" LInux distro and FBSD. Kevin Kinsey
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?41714A82.7010902>