Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 17:10:44 +0200 From: Pieter de Goeje <pieter@degoeje.nl> To: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: Alan Cox <alc@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" <hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: mmap MAP_NOSYNC regression in 10.x Message-ID: <540B23F4.1040608@degoeje.nl> In-Reply-To: <20140906074849.GS2737@kib.kiev.ua> References: <540903FF.6010602@degoeje.nl> <CAJUyCcNiLwLuL9crpQBjSdg4ED5kR53fPjyJG3HNmP5Roor8RQ@mail.gmail.com> <20140905080633.GM2737@kib.kiev.ua> <5409A4F8.6020204@degoeje.nl> <20140905123826.GP2737@kib.kiev.ua> <CAJ-Vmo=Dw02HsazH1n9wkXFDXM83bOnNLGndAt5=KZN9QHxyOw@mail.gmail.com> <20140906074849.GS2737@kib.kiev.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Konstantin Belousov schreef op 6-9-2014 9:48: > On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 12:46:31PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: >> Is this worth putting into the regression test suite? > I do not have opinion on this. Feel free to do if you consider it worth. > > Note that the code needs some tweaking to become automated test. > Also, there is no copyright assigned on the test, so you need > to handle this as well. > I can take a stab at converting it to something suitable for inclusion under tools/regression. One issue is that the test uses a heuristic to determine success or failure. I don't really see a way around that, although it certainly could be improved.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?540B23F4.1040608>