Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2002 20:37:20 -0400 (EDT) From: Trevor Johnson <trevor@jpj.net> To: Tony Maher <tonym@biolateral.com.au> Cc: alane@geeksrus.net, <dbader@eece.unm.edu>, <ports@FreeBSD.ORG>, <portmgr@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: move pbs to sysutils? Message-ID: <20020616203123.K2123-100000@blues.jpj.net> In-Reply-To: <200206162314.g5GNEcgD052507@dt.home>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Tony Maher wrote: > >> From: Alan E <alane@geeksrus.net> > >> I am planning on introducing a port of OpenPBS 2.3.16 into the tree, > >> once I have the licensing issues sorted out definitely. As I see it, as > >> a system daemon, it falls under sysutils. Would you consider requesting > >> a repocopy to move your port of pbs under sysutils so they would both be > >> in the same place? > > There is also net/generic-nqs to consider. Plus I am (and others) > working on Sun Grid Engine port. > IIRC I originally submitted generic-nqs under misc but it was moved > to net category as the commiter thought that was more appropriate. > (and I agree with this as the daemon(s) is networkable) > > I do not really care whether they are in net or sysutils but can we > have them *all* in the same category please (FWIW my vote is for net). I've requested a "parallel" category in which all of these would fit: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=39094 . -- Trevor Johnson To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020616203123.K2123-100000>