Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 11 Nov 1997 22:38:44 -0700 (MST)
From:      Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>
To:        Ted Spradley <tsprad@spradley.dyn.ml.org>
Cc:        Wes Peters <softweyr@xmission.com>, Michael Knoll <knollm@lafcol.lafayette.edu>, stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: X11 and /tmp 
Message-ID:  <199711120538.WAA01996@rocky.mt.sri.com>
In-Reply-To: <199711120506.XAA03728@set.spradley.dyn.ml.org>
References:  <199711111558.IAA01571@obie.softweyr.ml.org> <199711120506.XAA03728@set.spradley.dyn.ml.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> In the FAQ it says: "Starting xdm via /etc/ttys is a Bad Thing. I
> don't know why this crept into some README file."  No explanation at
> all of *why* it's a Bad Thing.  I *hate* that.  In defiance, I've been
> starting xdm by listing it in my /etc/ttys file for years with no
> noticeable ill effect.  Can anyone tell me *why* it's a Bad Thing?

It should be removed, and was based on a mis-understanding J'org had
about how xdm 'did it's thing'.


Nate



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199711120538.WAA01996>