Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 17:11:42 -0700 From: "Chris H" <bsd-lists@bsdforge.com> To: <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Removal of print/ghostscript*-nox11 Message-ID: <28becda74b976872bfe3f749fae755ae@ultimatedns.net> In-Reply-To: <20150820192408.41776.qmail@mailgate.gta.com> References: <20150820192408.41776.qmail@mailgate.gta.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 20 Aug 2015 19:24:08 -0000 lab@gta.com (Larry Baird) wrote > We have serveral headless FreeBSD servers that use the ghostscript nox11 > port. We currently compile all of the ports on these boxes and have > "OPTIONS_UNSET=X11" configured in /etc/make.conf. Just in case we ever > switched to pre-compile ports, my vote would be for Plan B. But as long as > there is a way to not require X11 on these boxes I can live with either > plan. +1 I realize that plan B is a bit more work. But if I had a choice, I'd choose plan B. Thank you very much for all the time you're putting into this! --Chris > > Larry > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Larry Baird > Global Technology Associates, Inc. 1992-2012 | http://www.gta.com > Celebrating Twenty Years of Software Innovation | Orlando, FL > Email: lab@gta.com | TEL 407-380-0220 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?28becda74b976872bfe3f749fae755ae>