Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 21:51:09 -0300 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> To: Nadav Eiron <nadav@cs.Technion.AC.IL> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, Jason Andresen <jandrese@mitre.org> Subject: Re: technical comparison Message-ID: <3B0B097D.B6C5BB40@newsguy.com> References: <Pine.GSO.3.95-heb-2.07.1010522222340.14554A-100000@csd>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Nadav Eiron wrote: > > I ran tests that I think are similar to what Jason ran on identically > configured FreeBSD and Linux/ReiserFS machines. ResierFS is much much > faster than UFS+softupdates on these tests. > > FreeBSD 4.3-RELEASE (ufs/softupdates): 4.3 does not have the dirpref changes. (Hey, once in a while we can play the kernel of the day game! :) -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org capo@the.secret.bsdconspiracy.net wow regex humor... I'm a geek To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3B0B097D.B6C5BB40>