Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 14 Jan 2004 18:21:52 +0100
From:      =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sten_Daniel_S=F8rsdal?= <sten.daniel.sorsdal@wan.no>
To:        "Luigi Rizzo" <rizzo@icir.org>, <ipfw@freebsd.org>
Subject:   RE: semantics of 'not-applicable' options in ipfw ?
Message-ID:  <0AF1BBDF1218F14E9B4CCE414744E70F5D977C@exchange.wanglobal.net>

Next in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
> As the subject says... what is people's opinion on the best=20
> semantics for 'not-applicable' options in ipfw rules ?
>=20

I think 'none'.

_// Sten Daniel S=F8rsdal



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0AF1BBDF1218F14E9B4CCE414744E70F5D977C>