Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 12:49:55 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Old version of bison Message-ID: <20050104204955.GA13991@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20050104122732.19cf503c.gstewart@bonivet.net> References: <20050104122732.19cf503c.gstewart@bonivet.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 12:27:32PM +0100, Godwin Stewart wrote:
> Ports cvsup'ed yesterday,
>=20
> $ cat /usr/ports/devel/bison/Makefile
> {snip}
> PORTNAME=3D bison
> PORTVERSION=3D 1.75
> PORTREVISION=3D 2
> {snip}
>=20
> Is there any particular reason why ports are sticking with this version w=
hen
> 1.875 was released 2 years ago almost to the day?
Yes, the bison developers apparently don't understand why a
widely-used build tool should need to remain backwards-compatible with
itself (see also: autoconf, automake developers).
Kris
--4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFB2wFzWry0BWjoQKURAr5VAKDkt/Ord4FOC4NTZ7qUgVlalTt3jQCePlRP
ZUBVfCGStXWvymIVt9AkgS0=
=g8nQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050104204955.GA13991>