Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 15:51:03 -0800 From: "Kip Macy" <kip.macy@gmail.com> To: "Attilio Rao" <attilio@freebsd.org> Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, ache@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern subr_sleepqueue.c Message-ID: <b1fa29170612161551v11b96464m121bb0f8f3f41100@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <3bbf2fe10612161541t66d0044di70ff9df6444068e1@mail.gmail.com> References: <200612162117.kBGLHR1B088020@repoman.freebsd.org> <b1fa29170612161525q422b78dcjb5d002edd525f21a@mail.gmail.com> <3bbf2fe10612161541t66d0044di70ff9df6444068e1@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
it would have to be under ifdef INVARIANTS On 12/16/06, Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org> wrote: > > 2006/12/17, Kip Macy <kip.macy@gmail.com>: > > Trying to avoid the aesthetically displeasing nested brackets is why I > made > > the mistake in the first place. > > Why not put 'int i' at the top of the function? > In should be more style compliant in this way. > > Attilio > > > -- > Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. Einstein >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b1fa29170612161551v11b96464m121bb0f8f3f41100>