Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 23 Apr 2000 11:46:34 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
To:        Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>
Cc:        freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Linux emulation scripting fix to be committed to 5.x and 4.x wednesday 
Message-ID:  <200004231846.LAA63231@apollo.backplane.com>
References:   <45496.956515071@critter.freebsd.dk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

:
:In message <200004231835.LAA62963@apollo.backplane.com>, Matthew Dillon writes:
:
:>    I intend to commit this to -current and immediately MFC it to -stable.
:>    I don't expect there to be any controversy though I'm sure there is a
:>    cleaner way to do it.
:
:I don't see anything justifying an immediate MFC in this patch.  Please
:allow the normal waiting period to elapse before you MFC.
:
:--
:Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20

    It's such a simple patch, and it fixes problems that would otherwise
    exist under 4.x's linux emulation, and it only effects the linux 
    emulation.  And I've been running it for a while under 5.x already (as 
    I said).  And I put it up for a review 2 weeks ago.  And it makes no
    major infrastructure changes to the core system.

    Unless you can justify a reason for it NOT to be MFC'd immediately, I
    see no reason to wait for this particular baby.  That is, unless you
    *like* linux applications that use scripts to start running FreeBSD
    utilities even when you have all the appropriate linux packages
    installed!

					-Matt
					Matthew Dillon 
					<dillon@backplane.com>


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200004231846.LAA63231>