Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 23:51:34 -0400 From: Mike Makonnen <mtm@identd.net> To: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> Cc: threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Regression in libthr on ia64 Message-ID: <20030630035135.WEWF20810.pop015.verizon.net@kokeb.ambesa.net> In-Reply-To: <20030630030106.GA1345@athlon.pn.xcllnt.net> References: <20030630030106.GA1345@athlon.pn.xcllnt.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 29 Jun 2003 20:01:06 -0700 Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> wrote: > It doesn't matter if I compile with -DWITH_SLEEP or not. > > Is this a known issue? Is there some work in progress still? > 2nd question first: yes, there is still more work to be done, but committed bits should be self-contained and not break anything. Did you update both your kernel and libthr together? when? There was a window of opportunity (several hours) yesterday where the interface to sigtimedwait was changed but libthr was not. Also, is it possible to narrow down the time frame during which it broke? It seems strange; however, that a statically linked executable would behave differently. Cheers. -- Mike Makonnen | GPG-KEY: http://www.identd.net/~mtm/mtm.asc mtm@identd.net | D228 1A6F C64E 120A A1C9 A3AA DAE1 E2AF DBCC 68B9 mtm@FreeBSD.Org| FreeBSD - The Power To Serve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030630035135.WEWF20810.pop015.verizon.net>