Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 20:59:54 GMT From: Rene Ladan <rene@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: ports/159773: security/nettle fails to compile on i386 with clang Message-ID: <201108142059.p7EKxsZq013884@red.freebsd.org> Resent-Message-ID: <201108142100.p7EL0Gg9094364@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 159773 >Category: ports >Synopsis: security/nettle fails to compile on i386 with clang >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Responsible: freebsd-ports-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Sun Aug 14 21:00:16 UTC 2011 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Rene Ladan >Release: FreeBSD 9.0 >Organization: >Environment: FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #0: Sun Aug 14 18:57:14 CEST 2011 root@tinderbox.host:/usr/src/sys/magic/kernel/path i386 clang revision 135360 >Description: security/nettle builds fine with clang on amd64 but fails on i386 because clang cannot decide on the size of a 'sub' instruction. i386-tinderbox log at http://rene-ladan.nl:8080/tb/errors/9-FreeBSD-clang/nettle-2.2.log >How-To-Repeat: Try to build security/nettle on i386 with CC=clang and CXX=clang++ >Fix: Instruct clang to use the correct variant of the 'sub' instruction. >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted:
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201108142059.p7EKxsZq013884>