Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 23:19:11 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: d@delphij.net Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PAM modules Message-ID: <86ty86zzcg.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <4E78EA46.2080806@delphij.net> (Xin LI's message of "Tue, 20 Sep 2011 12:32:22 -0700") References: <86boukbk8s.fsf@ds4.des.no> <4E738794.4050908@delphij.net> <86zki1afto.fsf@ds4.des.no> <4E78EA46.2080806@delphij.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Xin LI <delphij@delphij.net> writes: > The main concern I have is that users might want to stay on an older > FreeBSD release, while wanting features of a new OpenLDAP. That's why > I would prefer a libxml style import -- users always have choice to > install a new OpenLDAP without any concern of breaking their system > and we can always deliver security fixes with freebsd-update. Would > that make the trimmed down and renamed OpenLDAP import sound sensible? Yes, you have a point. So you're saying: - client side only (for nss_ldap, pam_ldap etc) - namespace hacks to avoid colliding with the port right? I would definitely support that. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86ty86zzcg.fsf>