Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 9 Feb 2011 07:15:51 +0000
From:      Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, Pietro Cerutti <gahr@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/x11-toolkits/fox16 Makefile distinfo
Message-ID:  <20110209071551.GA66888@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <4D522265.8020003@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <201102081137.p18BbbsE075200@repoman.freebsd.org> <4D522265.8020003@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 09:13:09PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> I'm pretty sure that the ports which depend on fox will need a 
> PORTREVISION bump. xfe needed to be rebuilt when I tried using it today 
> after this change.
> 
> Since this change happened before the tag got laid down this may be an 
> issue for the package builds related to the upcoming releases.
> 
> On 02/08/2011 03:37, Pietro Cerutti wrote:
> >gahr        2011-02-08 11:37:37 UTC
> >
> >   Modified files:
> >     x11-toolkits/fox16   Makefile distinfo
> >   Log:
> >   - Update to 1.6.43a
> >     See the project home page for news.
> >
> >   Feature safe:   yes

Moreover, I think that updating GUI toolkit can be classified as
touching quite a few of ports, and thus should not be considered as
feature safe in the first place.

./danfe



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110209071551.GA66888>