Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 20:10:52 -0400 From: "Devon H. O'Dell" <devon.odell@coyotepoint.com> To: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org> Cc: pav@FreeBSD.org, doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Fix for ithread.9 Message-ID: <44EF918C.1010600@coyotepoint.com> In-Reply-To: <20060825195110.450a1a7b.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> References: <44EF355D.5050208@coyotepoint.com> <1156532704.8612.2.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> <20060825195110.450a1a7b.trhodes@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Tom Rhodes wrote: > On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 21:05:04 +0200 > Pav Lucistnik <pav@freebsd.org> wrote: > >> Devon H. O'Dell píše v pá 25. 08. 2006 v 13:37 -0400: >> >>> I was discussing UMA with Robert Watson yesterday; specifically its >>> usage implications in an interrupt context. He suggested adding some >>> information to ithread(9) specifying semantics for memory allocation in >>> an interrupt context. So I came up with this tiny patch, shot it jhb@'s >>> way, he reviewed it and told me to shoot it this way. >>> >>> So here it is, apparently ready to be committed. >> Applied, thanks! > > After you fixed the hard sentence break issue, right Pav? ;) ? I don't see a hard sentence break in my patch or the commit. --dho
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44EF918C.1010600>