Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 09:07:27 +0200 From: "Anthony Atkielski" <anthony@atkielski.com> To: <chat@FreeBSD.ORG>, "Brett Glass" <brett@lariat.org> Subject: Re: Anti-UNIX site switches to Win2K and then fails Message-ID: <01bb01c1dade$375d97c0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> References: <4.3.2.7.2.20020402224543.00bf4c60@nospam.lariat.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Having used and administered both Windows/IIS and UNIX/Apache, I think that the latter wins hands-down without any contest at all. The problem is that most people haven't used both. IIS seemed okay (although frustrating at times) before I tried Apache. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brett Glass" <brett@lariat.org> To: <chat@FreeBSD.ORG> Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 07:50 Subject: Anti-UNIX site switches to Win2K and then fails > According to a ZDNet article at > > http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1104-874223.html > > "wehavethewayout.com", which switched from Apache/FreeBSD to IIS/Win2K > after it was pointed out that the anti-UNIX site was running on UNIX, is > now offline -- apparently due to a server misconfiguration or crash. > Ironically, this is perfectly in keeping with the track records of the > respective Web server/OS combinations.... > > --Brett Glass > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?01bb01c1dade$375d97c0$0a00000a>