Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 23:40:50 +0200 (CEST) From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> To: Jens Schweikhardt <schweikh@schweikhardt.net> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports, portsdb and /etc/src.conf interaction Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0603282333150.13539@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> In-Reply-To: <20060328210508.GA2424@schweikhardt.net> References: <20060328210508.GA2424@schweikhardt.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006, Jens Schweikhardt wrote: > it appears there is some unexpected interaction between the ports and > the recently introduced /etc/src.conf on 7-CURRENT. The man page > src.conf(5) lists among others WITHOUT_FORTRAN and WITHOUT_NIS. > [...] > "/usr/share/mk/bsd.own.mk", line 353: WITH_FORTRAN and WITHOUT_FORTRAN can't both be set. > [...] > The first happens because /usr/ports/lang/gfortran/Makefile defines > WITH_FORTRAN unconditionally. I think a possible fix would be to > have it depend on the setting of WITHOUT_FORTRAN (this message > cc'd to lang/gfortran maintainer gerald@FreeBSD.org). Well, but setting WITH_FORTRAN to build lang/gcc41 is the only reason for the lang/gfortran port to exist. Since this is just an option for lang/gcc41, I'd be glad to see the lang/gfortran port being removed; users just would have to build one of the recent lang/gcc ports with WITH_FORTRAN being set. Does that sound okay? Gerald
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.61.0603282333150.13539>