Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2000 19:14:32 -0600 From: Jeremy Shaffner <jeremy@external.org> To: Doug Barton <DougB@gorean.org> Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/23596: New Port: editors/pico Message-ID: <20001217191431.A54615@external.org> In-Reply-To: <3A3D5AA4.2782DE34@gorean.org>; from DougB@gorean.org on Sun, Dec 17, 2000 at 04:30:28PM -0800 References: <200012171105.eBHB5AT52715@indigo.external.org> <3A3D5AA4.2782DE34@gorean.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Dec 17, 2000 at 04:30:28PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: > Jeremy Shaffner wrote: > > > >Synopsis: New Port: editors/pico > > What your port does as far as I can tell is to download the source for > pine, but only build pico. While this may have some benefit in the minds > of the anti-pine zealots, I'm much more inclined to fix the pine port to > use a more up to date version. Do you mean a more up to date version of Pico? Pico is currently at version 3.7 and probably is still at 3.7 even in Pine 4.31. Updating Pine won't provide a pico-only port or offer a newer version of Pico. When Pine 4.31 is committed, I'll determine if Pico is newer or has different patches and then submit an update for it. An argument could be made for using Pine's PORTVERSION, but I saw no immediate benefit. > There may be some sympathy for a pico-only port, though, so I'll leave > this one open. Thankyou. I think a pico-only port is warranted. -- Jeremy --------------------------------------------------------------------- Jeremy Shaffner | This space for rent. jeremy@external.org | $ grep happiness life http://www.external.org/~jeremy/pgp.key | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001217191431.A54615>