Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 10:47:27 +0200 From: Marc Recht <recht@contentmedia.de> To: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@FreeBSD.org> Cc: aztlanet@gmx.net, gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: GNOME 2.1 upgrade Message-ID: <20021002104727.590f03a0.recht@contentmedia.de> In-Reply-To: <1033548212.1085.1.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com> References: <1033527725.295.11.camel@unxstar> <20021002104009.5a55baec.recht@contentmedia.de> <1033548212.1085.1.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=.lUrQE3:X1AN65/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > This isn't going to happen anytime soon. We're shipping 4.7-RELEASE > with 1.4.1 as the default GNOME desktop. The primary reasons being lack Oh. Ok, then dropping 1.4.1 isn't that good idea.. :-) > of fully working I18N and most GNOME 2 apps are still beta at best. Indeed. > I think doing -devel versions is the way to go if 2.1 is put into the > tree. The downside of this is that there will be one more version of > GNOME to support. But, as you mentioned yourself, GNOME2 is beta. So, why not replacing the components with "official" beta versions? Marc --=.lUrQE3:X1AN65/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9mrKf7YQCetAaG3MRAs7TAJ9jY2iKtTRlAV+FD6V/jLt3FLhN/wCeLTIW JmUb3QGUBysBIVRBlTZOgTs= =4yz5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=.lUrQE3:X1AN65/-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-gnome" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021002104727.590f03a0.recht>