Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 13:56:59 +0300 From: Vladimir Ivanov <wawa@yandex-team.ru> To: Jack Vogel <jfvogel@gmail.com> Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Stable List <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: em watchdogs - OS involvement Message-ID: <47285F7B.7010809@yandex-team.ru> In-Reply-To: <2a41acea0710301317w8e820f2pdbd7f3ca1e1f6a30@mail.gmail.com> References: <2a41acea0710301317w8e820f2pdbd7f3ca1e1f6a30@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jack Vogel wrote: > Things just keep getting stranger... its no wonder I didn't see this... > > I had been trying to repro the watchdog on a machine in my cube at work > without success, but in the test Lab they were successful. I scratched my > head for a while wondering why... > > But then I realized I had the Sept snapshot in my cube, reinstalled it to > the Oct snapshot and now it watchdogs like a champ too..... > > Another bit of data, if I define DEVICE_POLLING on the Oct. snap it > also will work. > > SOOOOO, what changes were made to interrupts between Sept and > October, something I need to do perhaps that wasnt done?? > > Any ideas?? Shared irq is a very big problem w/FAST_INTR seems to be. There are a lot of drops if ethernet shares IRQ w/UHCI e.g. Maybe you've seen this issue. > > Jack > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47285F7B.7010809>