Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 18 Mar 2008 11:48:15 +0300
From:      "Andrey V. Elsukov" <bu7cher@yandex.ru>
To:        Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
Cc:        Vadim Goncharov <vadim_nuclight@mail.ru>, freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: kern/80642: [ipfw] [patch] ipfw small patch - new RULE OPTION
Message-ID:  <47DF81CF.9040906@yandex.ru>
In-Reply-To: <47DF78AF.400@elischer.org>
References:  <200803122100.m2CL0t7V088955@freefall.freebsd.org> <slrnfthsg7.dgk.vadim_nuclight@hostel.avtf.net> <20080313094356.GA9219@tin.it> <47DF72A3.4030502@yandex.ru> <47DF78AF.400@elischer.org>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
Julian Elischer wrote:
>> About Vadim's prepositions:
>> 1. tablearg: it's possible, but now we use u32 argument in
>> tables, but counterlimits are 64-bits values. First of we
>> should extend our current table argument to 64 bit.
> 
> tables should be expanded to have different types of values..
> 32 but ints
> IP addresses (currently I'm overlaying it on 32 bit ints)
> IPV6 addresses.
> skipto locations
> byte limits..

Yes, i agree. As I remember, we already talked about this
some time ago.

-- 
WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47DF81CF.9040906>