Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 07:53:27 +0200 From: =?windows-1252?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?= <sos@DeepCore.dk> To: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem with sata drive Message-ID: <414E7057.30200@DeepCore.dk> In-Reply-To: <6.1.2.0.0.20040919191030.07238138@64.7.153.2> References: <1827510723.20040919214144@sir-mag.com> <414DF473.6060208@DeepCore.dk> <6.1.2.0.0.20040919191030.07238138@64.7.153.2>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mike Tancsa wrote: > At 05:04 PM 19/09/2004, S=F8ren Schmidt wrote: >=20 >> Uro=9A Gruber wrote: >> >>> Hello! >>> I've notice that freebsd from beta4 does not recognize my sata 150 dr= ive >>> anymore. With beta3 it works now with beta4 or beta5 there's only=20 >>> udma33. >>> I have ICH6 chipset, is there anything I can do. here is my dmesg out= put >> >> >> The ICH6 is not supported yet (ENOHW), so it will show up as a generic= =20 >> ATA controller. However since all SATA controllers (at least until we = >> get SATA-II) always run the interface at 150MB/s thats what you will=20 >> get no matter >=20 > Hi, > Are there big differences between the ICH5 and ICH6 controllers= =20 > ? I have one of these boards and it seems to work fine if I add a def = > for it in ata-pci.h and ata-chipset.c. Also what does ENOHW mean ? I=20 > didnt find it in google. The ich6 is one of the first chips to support the AHCI inteface which is = sortof what Promise and others have had for some time in "proprietary"=20 versions. That said, IIRC the ich6 has a compatibility mode where it will work as=20 just a good old ich controller, so adding the PCI id's should do it. Anyhow I havn't been able to look into it since I dont have access to=20 any ich6 HW (E NO HW :) ).. -S=F8ren
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?414E7057.30200>