Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 12 Mar 2010 06:51:34 -0800
From:      Matthew Jacob <mj@feral.com>
To:        freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: How is supposed to be protected the units list?
Message-ID:  <4B9A54F6.8040204@feral.com>
In-Reply-To: <3bbf2fe11003120601y3c403a1ct50f9fc6c1f0903bf@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <3bbf2fe11002281655i61a5f0a0if3f381ad0c4a1ef8@mail.gmail.com>	<3bbf2fe11003031357o518d6028m8157d9110a9122f3@mail.gmail.com>	<4B8EF128.8050704@feral.com>	<3bbf2fe11003031532u2207eb55h19c3a045215a7d84@mail.gmail.com>	<4B8EF336.80107@feral.com>	<3bbf2fe11003031547kd5f7314t3d83b2bde06c1c2f@mail.gmail.com>	<4B8EF990.5030407@feral.com>	<3bbf2fe11003031607wa3727b5ke89bc2a909d4d6a6@mail.gmail.com>	<4B901419.8060800@feral.com>	<3bbf2fe11003041737p30690522ya81e1b8f4bd6bbf9@mail.gmail.com> <3bbf2fe11003120601y3c403a1ct50f9fc6c1f0903bf@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

I'm okay with it at present.

> So, as long as it seems nobody had a strong argument against this
> patch, what do you think about me committing it?
> We can further refine later if we think it is the case.
>
> Also, I think that Matt's patch should be committed just after this
> one (and possibly we should investigate a similar add-on for the ata
> counterpart too?).
>
> Thanks,
> Attilio
>
>
>    




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4B9A54F6.8040204>