Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 22:59:09 -0700 From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Kip Macy <kmacy@freebsd.org> Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> Subject: Re: strange TCP issue on RELENG_7 Message-ID: <48B0F8AD.1090601@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <3c1674c90808232255s30a6fce7ma8e081e935a6adbc@mail.gmail.com> References: <200808221719.m7MHJY25090566@lava.sentex.ca> <20080822191146.T66593@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <200808221922.m7MJMcUN091064@lava.sentex.ca> <3c1674c90808231916l2c92a8e4sae0f191af31b5870@mail.gmail.com> <200808240312.m7O3CZS0098145@lava.sentex.ca> <48B0F722.3050005@elischer.org> <3c1674c90808232255s30a6fce7ma8e081e935a6adbc@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kip Macy wrote: > On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 10:52 PM, Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> wrote: >> Mike Tancsa wrote: >>> At 10:16 PM 8/23/2008, Kip Macy wrote: >>>> Can you help me out a bit with your workload? >>>> >>>> tcp_offload_connect(...) needs to determine which interface an address >>>> corresponds to see if that interface supports TCP offload. The code >>>> does the exact same thing as ip_output does except it doesn't have the >>>> inpcb locked (which isn't used as part of the route lookup). >>> This is the only RELENG_7 box that I have where it routes tcp packets >>> asymmetrically, so that sounds like it might be the portion that is badly >>> interacting. The server has just one default gateway, which is out em0, but >>> clients all over the net will connect to IP addresses aliased on lo0 and to >>> the one IP on em1. But all connections exit out em0 other than connected >>> routes of course. >>> >>> ---Mike >>> >>>> Julian has worked in this code most recently, maybe he has some idea >>>> what is going on. >>>> >> huh? wha? I haven't been following this thread.. what's up? >> > Julian - see previous e-mails, the arp cache gets messed up as a > result of calling rtalloc in tcp_offload.c - which is done to > determine which interface will be used for connection. Any thoughts on > why it may end up with dozens of bogus entries? > > -Kip has anyone tried the same scenario on -current?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?48B0F8AD.1090601>