Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 16 Feb 2003 23:54:58 -0600
From:      Juli Mallett <jmallett@FreeBSD.org>
To:        "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru>
Cc:        Tim Robbins <tjr@FreeBSD.ORG>, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/stdlib rand.c
Message-ID:  <20030216235458.A40677@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20030217055309.GA28024@nagual.pp.ru>; from ache@nagual.pp.ru on Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 08:53:09AM %2B0300
References:  <200302170352.h1H3qawJ062671@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030217045729.GA68471@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030217164048.A28273@dilbert.robbins.dropbear.id.au> <20030217055309.GA28024@nagual.pp.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* De: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> [ Data: 2003-02-16 ]
	[ Subjecte: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/stdlib rand.c ]
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 16:40:48 +1100, Tim Robbins wrote:
> 
> > I don't think rand()
> > needs a warning message like gets() &c. because it's not as dangerous.
> 
> Wait, what kind of warning __warn_references() produce? I was under 
> impression that it is compile-time only.

I don't like the idea of this, people using rand incorrectly deserve to
get their foot shot off.  People using it legitimately don't need to have
their heart skip a beat whenever thye link on FreeBSD because it looks like
there's some danger to using rand(), when it is perfectly good at what it
does, for a lot of common uses.

Thanx,
juli.
-- 
Juli Mallett <jmallett@FreeBSD.org> - AIM: BSDFlata -- IRC: juli on EFnet
OpenDarwin, Mono, FreeBSD Developer - ircd-hybrid Developer, EFnet addict
FreeBSD on MIPS-Anything on FreeBSD - Never trust an ELF, COFF or Mach-O!

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030216235458.A40677>