Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 10:45:31 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Josef Karthauser <joe@tao.org.uk> Cc: knu@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Thoughts on 'Attic'. Message-ID: <20010917104531.B82429@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20010917173306.D15600@tao.org.uk>; from joe@tao.org.uk on Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 05:33:06PM %2B0100 References: <20010917115742.A11675@tao.org.uk> <20010917092722.A83010@dragon.nuxi.com> <20010917173306.D15600@tao.org.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 05:33:06PM +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote: > > No. I don't like that `cvs rm' does not mention the Attic, but I can > > live with that. It is still helpful to see .../Attic/... on commits to > > branches where a file has been removed from the head as it gives a > > reminder of the state of things. > > It's irrelevant to a commit on a branch whether a file exists on > the HEAD or not. At least, it's not directly relevant to the commit > message in question. It has come up before with sysinstall commits. I am speaking from real-world experience. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010917104531.B82429>