Date: Mon, 3 Mar 1997 21:16:34 -0500 (EST) From: Charles Henrich <henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu> To: taob@risc.org (Brian Tao) Cc: hasty@rah.star-gate.com, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 2.2 Compiler slower than 2.1? (was RSA 56-bit key challenge) Message-ID: <199703040216.VAA00986@crh.cl.msu.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970303210308.16490B-100000@alpha.risc.org> from Brian Tao at "Mar 3, 97 09:05:17 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >
> > Damn annoying. Although genx claims the next client is much faster
> > on intel and alpha platforms, so we should be able to vault over it,
> > if they are correct.
>
> The 233-MHz PPro running FreeBSD is still easily the fastest
> individual CPU on the list though. Now all we need is someone to run
> 3.0-SMP on a 8-node PPro233 system to blow away that E6000 you just
> added to the list. :)
I could add 3 more processors actually, but I gotta leave some open.
Unfortunatly I probably will not be able to leave the code running for a long
period of time, but I wanted to be at the top for a few hours anyway :) I also
wanted to see if I could move vex up a notch.
-Crh
Charles Henrich Michigan State University henrich@msu.edu
http://pilot.msu.edu/~henrich
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199703040216.VAA00986>